| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Apple Seed |
Posted - 03/16/2013 : 08:30:32
Hi, I’m new here. I don’t have skin cancer but I did have a mole that I managed to remove with bloodroot paste a few years ago. I don’t know if the mole was cancerous or not, though.
Can anyone tell me what the difference is between bloodroot and Cansema in effectiveness? Are they just as good as each other, or is one better? And if they are as good as each other, how does a person make a choice between which one to use?
|
| 6 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Apple Seed |
Posted - 03/19/2013 : 17:13:17
Thanks. |
| trueson |
Posted - 03/19/2013 : 04:33:19
There's some interesting info below about the difference between pure bloodroot paste and Cansema-it suggests that bloodroot paste is milder acting and takes longer to work:
http://www.altcancer.com/products/bloodroot-paste |
| Apple Seed |
Posted - 03/18/2013 : 15:00:03
Ok. Thanks anyway. |
| trueson |
Posted - 03/17/2013 : 15:23:37
I'm sorry but i don't know the answer to that. Hopefully someone else will chime in. |
| Apple Seed |
Posted - 03/17/2013 : 09:24:22
I see. I was just curious as some people choose one over the other, and I couldn’t work out why. Is Cansema more “aggressive” in that it has zinc chloride in it, and does this mean it works faster than bloodroot alone? |
| trueson |
Posted - 03/17/2013 : 07:03:39
Cansema's main ingredient is bloodroot so really they are the same thing. |
